<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court rejects &#8216;Obama is British&#8217; case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Contributor for News, Technology, Sports, and Entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-22998</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-22998</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court filing (application, brief etc.) in the Connecticut Wrotnowski case is soooooo much better than that in the New Jersey Donofrio case (apparently hurredly written before the Nov 4 election) that I don’t think Team Obama should get too comfortable with the Court’s denial of the first case since the second case IS distributed for Dec 12 conference. How the heck can anyone effectively counter this (great work Leo): &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court filing (application, brief etc.) in the Connecticut Wrotnowski case is soooooo much better than that in the New Jersey Donofrio case (apparently hurredly written before the Nov 4 election) that I don’t think Team Obama should get too comfortable with the Court’s denial of the first case since the second case IS distributed for Dec 12 conference. How the heck can anyone effectively counter this (great work Leo): </p>
<p><a href="http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015" rel="nofollow">http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Dujour</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-22999</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Dujour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-22999</guid>
		<description>&quot;The nonpartisan Web site &lt;a href=&quot;http://Factcheck.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Factcheck.org&lt;/a&gt; examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama served on the board of Annenburg Foundation which runs FactCheck. org.   And it is a website, not a document validation service.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The Catholic Church confirmed that there were no cases of child molestation by their priests&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;These are not the droids you&#039;re looking for, move along&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeez Louise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The nonpartisan Web site <a href="http://Factcheck.org" rel="nofollow">Factcheck.org</a> examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama served on the board of Annenburg Foundation which runs FactCheck. org.   And it is a website, not a document validation service.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The Catholic Church confirmed that there were no cases of child molestation by their priests&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;These are not the droids you&#39;re looking for, move along&#8221;.</p>
<p>Jeez Louise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-23000</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-23000</guid>
		<description>Unreal. Perhaps we should all focus on IpodGate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unreal. Perhaps we should all focus on IpodGate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-7111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-7111</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court filing (application, brief etc.) in the Connecticut Wrotnowski case is soooooo much better than that in the New Jersey Donofrio case (apparently hurredly written before the Nov 4 election) that I don’t think Team Obama should get too comfortable with the Court’s denial of the first case since the second case IS distributed for Dec 12 conference. How the heck can anyone effectively counter this (great work Leo): &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court filing (application, brief etc.) in the Connecticut Wrotnowski case is soooooo much better than that in the New Jersey Donofrio case (apparently hurredly written before the Nov 4 election) that I don’t think Team Obama should get too comfortable with the Court’s denial of the first case since the second case IS distributed for Dec 12 conference. How the heck can anyone effectively counter this (great work Leo): </p>
<p><a href="http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015" rel="nofollow">http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Dujour</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-7110</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Dujour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-7110</guid>
		<description>&quot;The nonpartisan Web site &lt;a href=&quot;http://Factcheck.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Factcheck.org&lt;/a&gt; examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama served on the board of Annenburg Foundation which runs FactCheck. org.   And it is a website, not a document validation service.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The Catholic Church confirmed that there were no cases of child molestation by their priests&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;These are not the droids you&#039;re looking for, move along&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeez Louise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The nonpartisan Web site <a href="http://Factcheck.org" rel="nofollow">Factcheck.org</a> examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama served on the board of Annenburg Foundation which runs FactCheck. org.   And it is a website, not a document validation service.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The Catholic Church confirmed that there were no cases of child molestation by their priests&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;These are not the droids you&#39;re looking for, move along&#8221;.</p>
<p>Jeez Louise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-7109</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-7109</guid>
		<description>Unreal. Perhaps we should all focus on IpodGate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unreal. Perhaps we should all focus on IpodGate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-652</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court filing (application, brief etc.) in the Connecticut Wrotnowski case is soooooo much better than that in the New Jersey Donofrio case (apparently hurredly written before the Nov 4 election) that I don’t think Team Obama should get too comfortable with the Court’s denial of the first case since the second case IS distributed for Dec 12 conference. How the heck can anyone effectively counter this (great work Leo): &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court filing (application, brief etc.) in the Connecticut Wrotnowski case is soooooo much better than that in the New Jersey Donofrio case (apparently hurredly written before the Nov 4 election) that I don’t think Team Obama should get too comfortable with the Court’s denial of the first case since the second case IS distributed for Dec 12 conference. How the heck can anyone effectively counter this (great work Leo): </p>
<p><a href="http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015" rel="nofollow">http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Dujour</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Dujour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-651</guid>
		<description>&quot;The nonpartisan Web site &lt;a href=&quot;http://Factcheck.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Factcheck.org&lt;/a&gt; examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama served on the board of Annenburg Foundation which runs FactCheck. org.   And it is a website, not a document validation service.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The Catholic Church confirmed that there were no cases of child molestation by their priests&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;These are not the droids you&#039;re looking for, move along&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeez Louise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The nonpartisan Web site <a href="http://Factcheck.org" rel="nofollow">Factcheck.org</a> examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama served on the board of Annenburg Foundation which runs FactCheck. org.   And it is a website, not a document validation service.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The Catholic Church confirmed that there were no cases of child molestation by their priests&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;These are not the droids you&#39;re looking for, move along&#8221;.</p>
<p>Jeez Louise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://dailycontributor.com/supreme-court-rejects-obama-is-british-case/2057/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycontributor.com/?p=2057#comment-650</guid>
		<description>Unreal. Perhaps we should all focus on IpodGate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unreal. Perhaps we should all focus on IpodGate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/22 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: dailycontributor.com @ 2012-05-25 19:25:59 -->
